Andres D. Herrera v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

08-72521Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit01.06.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANDRES D. HERRERA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-72521
Agency No. A071-596-284
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 25, 2010**
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Andres D. Herrera, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
from an immigration judge’s order of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8
U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.
FILED
JUN 01 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-72521 2
In his opening brief, Herrera fails to address, and therefore has waived, any
challenge to the BIA’s dispositive determinations that he failed to establish good
moral character, see 8 C.F.R. § 1240.66(b)(3), as required for special rule
cancellation of removal, or eligibility for asylum, withholding of removal or relief
under the Convention Against Torture. See Husyev v. Mukasey, 528 F.3d 1172,
1183 (9th Cir. 2008).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.