Vasiliy Yuryevich Salmin; Pavel Yuryevich Salmin v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

07-73353Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit01.06.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
VASILIY YURYEVICH SALMIN;
PAVEL YURYEVICH SALMIN,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-73353
Agency Nos. A096-345-863
A096-344-270
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 25, 2010**
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Vasiliy Yuryevich Salmin and Pavel Yuryevich Salmin, natives and citizens
of Russia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order
denying their motions to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.
We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reconsider.
FILED
JUN 01 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

07-73353 2
Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002). We grant in part, remand
in part, and deny in part the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Vasiliy Yuryevich Salmin’s
motion to reconsider because the motion failed to point to any error of fact or law
in the BIA’s prior decision denying his motion to reopen as untimely and for
failing to demonstrate the due diligence required for equitable tolling. See 8 C.F.R.
§ 1003.2(b)(1).
The BIA failed to address the contentions raised by Pavel Yuryevich Salmin
in his motion to reconsider. We remand for the BIA to consider his contentions in
the first instance. Singh v. Gonzales, 416 F.3d 1006, 1015 (9th Cir. 2005).
In light of our disposition, we do not reach petitioners’ remaining
contentions. Each party shall bear its own costs in this petition for review.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part;
REMANDED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.