Oswaldo Antonio Salazar v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
OSWALDO ANTONIO SALAZAR,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-74956
Agency No. A073-967-205
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 5, 2010**
Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Oswaldo Antonio Salazar, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application for a waiver of
FILED
APR 19 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

07-74956 2
inadmissibility under Immigration and Nationality Act § 212(h), 8 U.S.C.
§ 1182(h). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in part
and deny in part the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s dispositive discretionary
determination that Salazar did not merit a grant of § 212(h) relief. See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Mejia v. Gonzales, 499 F.3d 991, 999 (9th Cir. 2007).
Salazar’s remaining contentions are not persuasive.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

-- 2 of 2 --