United States of America v. David Barajas Navarro

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NC/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID BARAJAS NAVARRO,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-50230
D.C. No. 3:04-cr-02276-LAB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 5, 2010**
Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
David Barajas Navarro appeals from the 18-month sentence imposed upon
revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
APR 14 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

NC/Research 09-50230 2
Navarro contends that the district court procedurally erred at sentencing by
failing to expressly calculate or consider the applicable Guidelines range. We
review Navarro's contention for plain error. See United States v. Hammons, 558
F.3d 1100, 1103 (9th Cir. 2009). Navarro has not shown that the district court's
failure to expressly calculate the applicable Guidelines range affected his
substantial rights. The Guidelines range was set out in the petition for revocation
of supervised release, the parties did not dispute that the range calculated in the
petition was correct, and the court sentenced within it.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --