United States of America v. MARTIN HERNANDEZ-OLGUIN, AKA Alvaro Martin Hernandez- Fuentes, AKA Martin…

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
SR/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARTIN HERNANDEZ-OLGUIN, AKA
Alvaro Martin Hernandez- Fuentes, AKA
Martin Hernandez-Olquin,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 08-10350
D.C. No. 4:06-cr-01610-FRZ
MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Frank R. Zapata, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2010**
Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Martin Hernandez-Olguin appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 66-
month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1326.
FILED
APR 01 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

SR/Research 08-10350 2
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hernandez-Olguin’s
counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion
to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the
opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or
answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district
court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --