Istvan Kele v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
AP/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ISTVAN KELE,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 04-73836
Agency No. A014-924-133
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 16, 2010**
Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Istvan Kele, a native and citizen of Hungary, petitions pro se for review of
the Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s decision to reinstate his prior
removal order. We dismiss the petition for review.
FILED
MAR 25 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

AP/Research 04-73836 2
After Kele filed the instant petition for review, an immigration judge
entered a removal order against him pursuant to a new Notice to Appear. Kele
waived appeal of that order and was removed to Hungary. Kele’s superseding
removal order renders this petition for review moot.
We deny Kele’s request in his February 23, 2005, letter to order the
government to submit documents pertaining to his underlying deportation
proceedings because this petition for review is not timely as to those proceedings.
See Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2003).
We deny Kele’s January 1, 2010, motion for an expedited decision as moot.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --