Rosa Amelia Uribe Bedoya v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
JT/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROSA AMELIA URIBE BEDOYA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-72825
Agency No. A070-962-709
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 16, 2010**
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Rosa Amelia Uribe-Bedoya, a native and citizen of Columbia, petitions pro
se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying her application
for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252.
FILED
FEB 26 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

JT/Research 07-72825 2
We review de novo questions of law. Aguilar Gonzales v. Mukasey, 534 F.3d
1204, 1208 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review.
Contrary to her contention, the agency did not deny Uribe-Bedoya’s
cancellation application on the basis of her expunged 1997 conviction. Uribe-
Bedoya has waived any challenge to the agency’s conclusion that her three 2001
convictions were crimes involving moral turpitude which precluded her from
demonstrating good moral character and rendered her ineligible for cancellation of
removal. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256-1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996).
We therefore need not reach Uribe-Bedoya’s remaining contentions
concerning hardship and continuous physical presence.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --