Luis Fernando Ibarra Arenas; Veronica Sandoval v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NV/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LUIS FERNANDO IBARRA ARENAS;
VERONICA SANDOVAL,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-70438
Agency Nos. A095-448-335
A095-448-336
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 16, 2010**
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges
Luis Fernando Ibarra Arenas and his wife, Veronica Sandoval, petition for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’order dismissing an immigration
FILED
FEB 25 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

NV/Research 07-70438 2
judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We
dismiss the petition for review.
Petitioners contend the IJ applied the incorrect legal standard to their
cancellation of removal application by failing to consider all the hardship factors
cumulatively. The record belies this contention. Because the IJ applied the correct
legal standard, we lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary hardship
determination. See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 980 (9th Cir. 2009);
see also Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 891 (9th Cir. 2003).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --