Maria Dora Leticia Rodriguez- Ochoa v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
TL/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA DORA LETICIA RODRIGUEZ-
OCHOA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-74868
Agency No. A091-858-863
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 16, 2010**
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Maria Dora Leticia Rodriguez-Ochoa, a native and citizen of Mexico,
petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying
FILED
FEB 24 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

TL/Research 07-74868 2
her application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8
U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review Rodriguez-Ochoa’s contention regarding the
BIA’s review of factual findings because she failed to raise it in her second appeal
to the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004).
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that
Rodriguez-Ochoa failed to establish the requisite hardship for cancellation of
removal. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --