Maria De Jesus Fuentes v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jlf/Inventory
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA DE JESUS FUENTES,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-71997
Agency No. A096-351-265
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 16, 2010**
San Francisco, California
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Maria De Jesus Fuentes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for
review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming
FILED
FEB 22 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

jlf/Inventory 07-71997 2
the immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal due to
her failure to establish the requisite hardship to her United States citizen children.
Fuentes contends that the immigration judge violated her due process rights
when the IJ failed to address all the hardship factors cumulatively. We lack
jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that petitioner failed to show
extreme hardship. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.
2003). In addition, we lack jurisdiction over petitioners’ contention that the BIA
failed to consider the cumulative impact of their hardship evidence because it is not
supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim.
See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 980 (9th Cir. 2009).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --