Juana Ines Salazar-Armenta v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without**
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
LA/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUANA INES SALAZAR-ARMENTA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 06-70748
Agency No. A074-820-499
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 11, 2010**
Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Juana Ines Salazar-Armenta, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision finding her removable for having participated
FILED
JAN 19 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

LA/Research 06-70748 2
in alien smuggling. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review
de novo questions of law. Altamirano v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 586, 591 (9th Cir.
2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
The IJ correctly determined that Salazar-Armenta is inadmissible due to her
participation in alien smuggling. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i); see also
Altamirano, 427 F.3d at 592.
We lack jurisdiction to consider Salazar-Armenta’s contention that the I-213
form did not demonstrate whether a government agent had informed her of her
rights because she did not raise that issue before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft,
358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

-- 2 of 2 --