Mario Arron Newsome v. LARRY SCRIBNER, Warden

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** Larry Scriber is substituted for his predecessor, S.J. Ryan, as Warden
of Calipatria State Prison, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision***
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIO ARRON NEWSOME,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
LARRY SCRIBNER, Warden,**
Respondent - Appellee.
No. 07-56117
D.C. No. CV-05-01534-IEG
MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Irma E. Gonzalez, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 15, 2009***
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Mario Arron Newsome appeals from the district
FILED
DEC 23 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

Research 07-56117 2
court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have
jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
Newsome contends that the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to
confrontation by admitting prior out-of-court statements made by five declarants
who testified at trial but could not recall whether they made the prior statements.
The district court correctly determined that the California Court of Appeal’s
rejection of Newsome’s Sixth Amendment claims was not contrary to, and did not
involve an unreasonable application of, clearly established Supreme Court law.
See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1); see also United States v. Owens, 484 U.S. 554, 559-60
(1988); California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149, 164 (1970).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --