United States of America v. Santos Hatfield

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without**
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
DRS/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SANTOS HATFIELD,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 07-10447
D.C. No. CR-05-00359-FCD
MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Frank C. Damrell, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 17, 2009**
Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Santos Hatfield appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 92-month
sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
FILED
DEC 14 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

DRS/Research 07-10447 2
§ 922(g)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hatfield’s
counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion
to withdraw as counsel of record. Hatfield has filed a pro se supplemental opening
brief and a pro se reply brief, and the government has filed an answering brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district
court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --