United States of America v. Humberto Moran-Torres

09-30253Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17.11.2009

Gesamter Gesetzestext

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without**
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
DRS/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HUMBERTO MORAN-TORRES,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-30253
D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00276-MJP-1
MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington
Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 17, 2009**
Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Humberto Moran-Torres appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 17-
month, two-week sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8
FILED
NOV 17 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

DRS/Research 09-30253 2
U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Moran-
Torres’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a
motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the
opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or
answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district
court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.