United States of America v. Chadwick Wayne Acison

11-2905Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit29.03.2013

Gesamter Gesetzestext

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-2506
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Chadwick Wayne Acison
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City
____________
Submitted: March 4, 2013
Filed: March 6, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
After Chadwick Acison stipulated to having violated his release conditions, the
district court revoked his supervised release and imposed a sentence of 30 months1
The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the1
Western District of Missouri.

-- 1 of 2 --

in prison with no supervised release to follow. Acison appeals, arguing that the court
imposed an unreasonable sentence. We disagree. The record shows that the district
court properly considered the relevant sentencing factors before imposing a
revocation sentence that was authorized by statute and within the applicable
Guidelines range. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d
822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009) (applying presumption of substantive reasonableness to
revocation sentence within Guidelines range); United States v. White Face, 383 F.3d
733, 740 (8th Cir. 2004) (court need not list every 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factor when
sentencing defendant upon revocation of supervised release).
The judgment is affirmed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.