Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-3774•Dolandon Mack v. Tim Dillon, Patrolman, Little Rock Police Department
11-3774Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit28.12.2012
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-1762
___________________________
Dolandon Mack
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Tim Dillon, Patrolman, Little Rock Police Department
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
Roger Swope, Crime Scene Investigator, Little Rock Police Department; Scott
Timmons, Lt., Little Rock Police Department; J. C. White, Detective, Little Rock
Police Department; John Does, 1 - 50; City of Little Rock, Arkansas; Jana
Rayburn, Patrolman, Little Rock Police Department; Kathy Trudell, Crime Scene
Investigator, Little Rock Police Department
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
____________
Submitted: December 6, 2012
Filed: December 10, 2012
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BYE, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Dolandon Mack appeals following the district court’s entry of1
judgment on a jury verdict in favor of Tim Dillon, a Little Rock police officer who
was the sole remaining defendant in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully2
reviewed the issues that Mack raises on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. The
district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable D. P. Marshall, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern1
District of Arkansas.
This court previously affirmed the grant of summary judgment as to all2
defendants except Dillon and Jana Rayburn. See Mack v. Dillon, 594 F.3d 620, 622-
24 (8th Cir. 2010) (per curiam).
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.