Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-3607•United States v. Phillip Brumfield
10-3607Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.07.2012
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-3494
___________
First Arkansas Bank & Trust, *
*
Plaintiff/Appellee, *
*
Mary L. Howard, *
* Appeal from the United States
Intervenor Plaintiff/Appellee, * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
v. *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Lincoln Benefit Life Company, *
*
Defendant/Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: June 14, 2012
Filed: July 3, 2012
___________
Before SMITH, BEAM, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Lincoln Benefit Life (LBL) appeals the district court's grant of summary1
judgment in favor of First Arkansas Bank & Trust and Mary Howard. This case
involves the interpretation of insurance policy language, which can be determined as
The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern1
District of Arkansas.
-- 1 of 2 --
a matter of law. There are no material facts in dispute. After careful de novo review
of the record as well as the parties' briefing on appeal, see Anderson v. Durham D &
M, L.L.C., 606 F.3d 513, 518 (8th Cir. 2010), we conclude that summary judgment
was properly granted for the reasons stated by the district court in its well-reasoned
analysis. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.