Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-2131•United States v. William Mefford
10-2131Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30.03.2012
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-2014
___________
Steven R. Blair, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * District of Nebraska.
*
City of Omaha, et al., * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees, *
*
___________
Submitted: February 15, 2012
Filed: March 22, 2012
___________
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Steven Blair appeals the district court’s dismissal of two private individuals,1
Patty Dory and Lori Anzaldo, who were named as defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
action. After careful review, we conclude that the claims in question are precluded2
The HONORABLE JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, United States District Judge1
for the District of Nebraska.
Dory and Anzaldo were incorrectly identified in the case caption as district2
court judges. We previously summarily affirmed the dismissal of two other
defendants, and Blair waived his claims against the remaining appellees.
-- 1 of 2 --
by the doctrine of res judicata, as these defendants were dismissed with prejudice in
a prior action brought by Blair. Blair v. Anderson, D. Neb. No. 4:04-cv-03229, R.
Docs. No. 42, 57. Accordingly, we affirm, and we deny all pending motions.
_________________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.