James Newport v. U.S. Dept. of Labor

10-1572Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30.12.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Southern District of Iowa.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-3002
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Southern
* District of Iowa.
Susan Iwasa Streeter, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: December 20, 2010
Filed: December 23, 2010
___________
Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
After a jury found Susan Streeter guilty of making a false claim against the
United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 287, the district court 1 sentenced her to one
year of probation. Her counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the evidence was insufficient
to support the verdict. In a pro se supplemental brief, Streeter argues that her
conviction was based on false testimony, and counsel was ineffective.

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
We conclude that the evidence, which we must view in the light most favorable
to the verdict, was sufficient for the jury to find Streeter guilty of the offense beyond
a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Williams, 534 F.3d 980, 985 (8th Cir. 2008)
(standard of review); United States v. Refert, 519 F.3d 752, 757 (8th Cir. 2008)
(elements of offense). We further conclude that Streeter’s conclusory assertion that
her conviction was based on false testimony does not warrant reversal, see United
States v. Coronel-Quintana, 752 F.2d 1284, 1290 (8th Cir. 1985); and we decline to
consider Streeter’s ineffective-assistance claim, because it is not properly raised in this
direct criminal appeal, see United States v. Lewis, 483 F.3d 871, 873 n.2 (8th Cir.
2007).
Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488
U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject to
counsel informing Streeter about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition
for certiorari.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.