James Newport v. U.S. Dept. of Labor

10-1572Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30.12.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern
District of Iowa.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-2300
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Southern District of Iowa.
Ronald Theodore Coleman, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: November 26, 2010
Filed: December 2, 2010
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Ronald Coleman pled guilty to conspiring to manufacture and distribute at least
500 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(A), 846. The
Government and the defense agreed that the applicable guidelines range was 262-327
months, and both parties requested a 262-month term. The district court 1 sentenced
Coleman to 262 months’ imprisonment and 10 years of supervised release. On appeal,
Coleman’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v.

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the district court did not make an
individualized assessment to determine the appropriateness of the requested sentence.
We reject this argument as it is unsupported by the sentencing transcript. We
conclude that the district court committed no procedural error and imposed a
substantively reasonable sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007)
(in reviewing sentence, appellate court first ensures that district court committed no
significant procedural error and then considers substantive reasonableness of sentence
under abuse-of-discretion standard; if sentence is within applicable guidelines range,
appellate court may apply presumption of reasonableness); United States v. Haack,
403 F.3d 997, 1004 (8th Cir. 2005) (describing abuse of discretion).
Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75
(1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s
motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.