United States v. Miguel Angel Chavez

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-1631
___________
United States of America, ex rel. *
Darlene C. Sammarco, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. *
*
Jane Morrow, as Anoka County Court * Appeal from the United States
Administrator, Anoka County; Daniel * District Court for the
Dauth, as Anoka County Social * District of Minnesota.
Services; Conservator Derrinda *
Mitchell, on Your Behalf; Karen Foy, * [UNPUBLISHED]
Manager of Andrew Residence, also *
known as Manager of Andrew *
Residence; Tom Mullon; Dr. James H. *
Gilbertson, Phd., *
*
Appellees, *
*
Cal Ludeman, as Minnesota *
Commissioner of Department of *
Human Services; Conservator Tracy *
Allen, designee for Professional *
Fiduciaries, Inc.; Dr. Jonathan Uecker; *
*
Defendants. *
___________
Submitted: October 14, 2010
Filed: October 20, 2010
___________

-- 1 of 2 --

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Darlene C. Sammarco appeals from the order of the District Court 1 dismissing
her civil action. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was
proper for the reasons stated by the District Court. We also find Sammarco’s
allegations of judicial bias to be without merit. See Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S.
540, 555 (1994). Accordingly, we affirm.
______________________________
1The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeffrey J.
Keyes, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --