United States v. Wesley Running Shield

09-1634Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit28.05.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1The Honorable L. Paige Marvel, United States Tax Court Judge.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-3092
___________
Michael E. Kohn; Catherine K. Kohn, *
*
Appellants, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * Tax Court.
*
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: May 2, 2010
Filed: May 26, 2010
___________
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Michael Kohn and Catherine Kohn challenge the tax court’s 1 decision, rendered
after a bench trial, upholding the Internal Revenue Service’s Notice of Determination
(NOD) related to the Kohns’ liabilities for tax year 2001. We review the tax court’s
legal conclusions de novo, and its findings of act for clear error. See Campbell v.
Comm’r, 164 F.3d 1140, 1142 (8th Cir. 1999).
Assuming without deciding that the tax court had authority under 26 U.S.C.
§ 6330(d)(1) to consider certain matters raised by the Kohns related to tax years prior

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
to 2001, cf. Orum v. Comm’r, 412 F.3d 819, 821-22 (7th Cir. 2005), we affirm the tax
court’s decision for the reasons stated in its memorandum and opinion. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.