Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-1634•United States v. Wesley Running Shield
09-1634Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit28.05.2010
1The Honorable William Jay Riley became Chief Judge of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on April 1, 2010.
2The Honorable Beth M. Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent
of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-2429
___________
Shelby J. Norris, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of *
Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: March 29, 2010
Filed: May 5, 2010
___________
Before RILEY, Chief Judge1, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Shelby J. Norris appeals the district court’s 2 order affirming the denial of
disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Having carefully
reviewed the record, see Medhaug v. Astrue, 578 F.3d 805, 813 (8th Cir. 2009)
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
(standard of review), we agree with the district court that the administrative law
judge’s (ALJ’s) findings concerning Norris’s mental residual functional capacity
(RFC) were supported by substantial evidence, see Moore v. Astrue, 572 F.3d 520,
523 (8th Cir. 2009) (in determining RFC, ALJ must consider all relevant evidence,
including medical records, observations of treating physicians and others, and
claimant’s own description of her limitations); see also Wagner v. Astrue, 499 F.3d
843, 848 (8th Cir. 2007) (it is ALJ’s function to resolve conflicts among opinions of
various examining and treating physicians). Norris’s other arguments for reversal
merit no discussion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.