Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-3842•United States v. James Boesen, Jr.
08-3842Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.03.2010
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-2145
___________
General Parker, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. *
*
Sakinah Parker; David Porter, * Appeal from the United States
Individually and in his capacity as an * District Court for the
officer of the St. Louis County Police; * Eastern District of Missouri.
Unknown Kaemmerer, Individually and *
in his capacity as an officer of the * [UNPUBLISHED]
St. Louis County Police; Unknown *
Lumato, Individually and in his *
capacity as an officer of the St. Louis *
County Police; Unknown Bello, *
Individually and in his capacity as an *
officer of the St. Louis County Police; *
Shiela Whirley; St. Louis County *
Police; 21st Judicial Circuit of *
Missouri; Brian Dunlop; Jolease *
Marshall; Pam Rush; St. Louis County *
Government, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: March 19, 2010
Filed: March 26, 2010
___________
-- 1 of 2 --
1The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.
-2-
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
General Parker appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
action alleging violations of various constitutional rights arising from his divorce and
custody dispute. Upon de novo review, see Goss v. City of Little Rock, 90 F.3d 306,
308 (8th Cir. 1996), we find no error in the district court’s dismissal. Accordingly,
we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.