Mayra Dominguez-Cortez v. Michael B. Mukasey

08-2092Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30.10.2009

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-2847
___________
David Johnson, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
Port City Janitors’ Supply *
& Paper Company, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: October 5, 2009
Filed: October 8, 2009
___________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
David Johnson appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his employment-discrimination action and the court’s ensuing denial of
his motion for reconsideration. After careful de novo review, see Davis v. KARK-TV,
Inc., 699, 703 (8th Cir. 2005), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the
reasons stated by the district court; and we also conclude that the court did not abuse

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
its discretion in denying reconsideration, see McAninch v. Wintermute, 491 F.3d 759,
775 (8th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.