Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-3582•Cliff Ambrose, Jr. v. William Angrick, II
08-3582Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30.09.2009
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-3332
___________
Penny Foster, *
*
Plaintiff - Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Michael J. Astrue, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Defendant - Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 16, 2009
Filed: September 9, 2009
___________
Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, HANSEN and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Penny Foster applied for Social Security disability and supplemental security
income benefits, alleging total disability primarily from low back pain and an anxiety
disorder. After a hearing, an administrative law judge (ALJ) denied benefits, and the
Appeals Council denied administrative review. The district court remanded for
additional proceedings. After a second hearing, a second ALJ denied Foster’s claims,
and the Appeals Council again denied administrative review. Foster commenced this
action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s final
decision denying all benefits.
-- 1 of 2 --
1The HONORABLE JERRY W. CAVANEAU, United States Magistrate Judge
for the Eastern District of Arkansas, presiding with the consent of the parties pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-2-
The district court 1 affirmed the Commissioner’s decision, concluding in a
thorough opinion that the findings and conclusions were supported by substantial
evidence in the administrative record as a whole. Foster appeals, arguing that the ALJ
improperly discounted the opinions of her treating physicians and her subjective
complaints of pain. After careful review of the record, we affirm for the reasons
stated in the district court’s Order dated September 30, 2008. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.