Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
07-3720•United States v. June Garcia
07-3720Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30.06.2009
1The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
Nos. 07-3198/08-1076
___________
Harsh S. Katoch, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeals from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Missouri.
Mediq/PRN Life *
Support Services, INC., * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: June 5, 2009
Filed: June 23, 2009
___________
Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Following this court’s affirmance of the grant of summary judgment to
defendant Mediq/PRN Life Support Systems, Inc. (Mediq) in Harsh Katoch’s
employment-discrimination action, see Katoch v. Mediq/PRN Life Support Sys., Inc.,
223 Fed. Appx. 532 (8th Cir. 2007) (unpublished per curiam), the district court 1
entered the orders which are the subject of these consolidated appeals. We find no
basis, and Katoch and his counsel have provided none, for reversing the district
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
court’s orders taxing costs in favor of Mediq, see 168th & Dodge, LP v. Rave
Reviews Cinemas, LLC, 501 F.3d 945, 957-58 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review;
prevailing party is presumed entitled to recover all costs); directing Katoch’s counsel
to pay attorney’s fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and the court’s inherent authority, see
Tenkku v. Normandy Bank, 348 F.3d 737, 743-44 (8th Cir. 2003) (reviewing for
abuse of discretion award of § 1927 sanctions, and for clear error related factual
findings); or sanctioning Katoch’s counsel for contempt, see Jake’s, Ltd. v. City of
Coates, 356 F.3d 896, 899-900 (8th Cir. 2004) (reviewing for abuse of discretion
decision to enter civil contempt order, and for clear error related factual findings).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.