Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
07-1527•United States v. Kristopher Hamberg
07-1527Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30.09.2008
1The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the reports and recommendations of the Honorable Arthur J.
Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-1459
___________
Joseph Johnson, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Special Agent Josh Florell; *
Officer Steve Parshall; Officer Mark * [UNPUBLISHED]
Sletta; Officer Andy Stender; City of *
Minneapolis; David Steinkamp, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: September 5, 2008
Filed: September 15, 2008
___________
Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Joseph Johnson appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal and grant of summary
judgment in favor of defendants in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v.
Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Johnson’s arguments, we find
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
no basis for reversal. See Federer v. Gephardt, 363 F.3d 754, 757 (8th Cir. 2004) (de
novo standard of review for Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal); Anderson v. Larson,
327 F.3d 762, 767 (8th Cir. 2003) (de novo standard of review for grant of summary
judgment). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.