Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-3869•Paul Welch v. Mat Manning
06-3869Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30.06.2008
1The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-2979
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
Luis Mariles-Santos, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: May 26, 2008
Filed: June 9, 2008
___________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Luis Mariles-Santos challenges the reasonableness of his 19-month within-
Guidelines-range prison sentence, which the district court1 imposed after Mariles-
Santos pleaded guilty to illegally entering the United States after deportation
following a felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(1).
We conclude that Mariles-Santos’s sentence is not unreasonable and therefore
was not abuse of the district court’s discretion. See United States v. Haack, 403 F.3d
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
997, 1003 (8th Cir. 2005) (abuse-of-discretion review standard). The court
specifically acknowledged the advisory nature of the Guidelines and referenced
several of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, and nothing in the record
indicates that the court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an
improper factor, or made a clear error of judgment in weighing appropriate factors.
See Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-68 (2007) (allowing appellate
presumption of reasonableness for within-Guidelines-range sentence); United States
v. Clay, 524 F.3d 877, 878 (8th Cir. 2008) (applying presumption); Haack, 403 F.3d
at 1004 (listing circumstances that may warrant finding of abuse of discretion).
Accordingly, we affirm.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.