Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
07-2074•James Stephenson v. Ramy El-Batrawi
07-2074Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30.04.2008
1 The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
________________
No. 07-2485
________________
Anry Arzuman, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * Western District of Missouri
*
Department of Natural Resources, * [UNPUBLISHED]
State of Missouri; State of Missouri, *
*
Appellees. *
________________
Submitted: March 14, 2008
Filed: April 10, 2008
________________
Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
________________
PER CURIAM.
In this employment-discrimination action, Anry Arzuman appeals the district
court's 1 grant of summary judgment to his former employer, the Missouri Department
of Natural Resources. Having engaged in a careful de novo review of the record and
having thoroughly considered Arzuman's arguments, we agree with the district court
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
that there are no genuine issues of material fact and the appellees are entitled to
judgment as a matter of law on all three of Arzuman's claims. See Devin v. Schwan's
Home Serv., Inc., 491 F.3d 778, 785 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of review). Construed
in the light most favorable to Arzuman, the summary judgment record is insufficient
to establish a prima facie case of disparate treatment, hostile work environment, or
retaliation. See Devin, 491 F.3d at 785-89 (describing the showings required to make
out a prima facie case under these three theories of employment discrimination).
Accordingly, we agree with the thorough and well-reasoned opinion of the
district court and affirm its judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.