Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-2929•Suryoadi Suryoadi v. Alberto Gonzales
06-2929Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.07.2007
1The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District
of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-1450
___________
Michael Carmie Antonelli, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
Linda Sanders, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: July 3, 2007
Filed: July 6, 2007
___________
Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Michael Carmie Antonelli appeals following the district court’s 1 dismissal of
his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and denial of his motion for relief from judgment. We
conclude that the dismissal of the section 2241 petition was proper for the reasons
explained by the district court, see Abdullah v. Hedrick, 392 F.3d 957, 959 (8th Cir.
2004) (de novo standard of review), and that the district court did not abuse its
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
discretion in denying the motion for relief from judgment, see Sanders v. Clemco
Indus., 862 F.2d 161, 169-70 (8th Cir. 1988).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.