United States v. Roger Koch

05-4263Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit29.06.2007

Gesamter Gesetzestext

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-1819
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
April D. Abbott, * Western District of Missouri.
*
Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
___________
Submitted: May 30, 2007
Filed: June 29, 2007
___________
Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
April D. Abbott pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute 50 grams or more of
methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846. On
appeal, Abbott’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that Abbott’s guilty plea was not knowingly
and voluntarily made because of her extensive history of substance abuse.

-- 1 of 2 --

1The Honorable Garry A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
-2-
The attack on the voluntariness of Abbott’s plea is not properly before us,
however, because she failed to first raise the issue to the district court 1 by seeking to
withdraw her guilty plea. See United States v. Murphy, 899 F.2d 714, 716 (8th Cir.
1990) (claim of involuntary guilty plea “first must be presented to the district court
and [is] not cognizable on direct appeal”).
Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,
80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we allow counsel to
withdraw, and we affirm, on condition that he show that he has informed Abbott of
the procedures for petitioning the Supreme Court for certiorari, in compliance with
Part V of our plan to implement the Criminal Justice Act.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.