Linda M. White v. Riverview School

05-2920Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit27.04.2007

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-1211
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Archie Bob Jenkins, Jr., *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: April 6, 2007
Filed: April 17, 2007
___________
Before RILEY, HANSEN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Archie Bob Jenkins (Jenkins) appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed
upon his guilty plea to possessing at least one firearm after having been convicted of
multiple felonies, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e)(1). The court
sentenced Jenkins to 180 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release.
Jenkins’s counsel moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). In his pro se supplemental brief, Jenkins argues enhancing his
sentence based on prior convictions results in double punishment. Jenkins contends

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
his “illegal incarceration” gives rise to a private cause of action against his warden,
and on that basis he seeks an “equitable remedy” from this court.
We reject Jenkins’s argument, see United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 12, 14
(8th Cir. 1991) (use of prior crimes to enhance sentence does not violate Double
Jeopardy Clause), and hold his request for an equitable remedy is frivolous. Having
reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80
(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Thus, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw,
and we affirm.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.