Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-3019•United States v. Amesheo D. Cannon
05-3019Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.01.2007
1The Honorable Ross A. Walters, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Southern District of Iowa, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-1964
___________
Gabrielle F. Morris, M.D., *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Southern
* District of Iowa.
*
McFarland Clinic, P.C.; and * [UNPUBLISHED]
Terry McGeeney, M.D., *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: January 8, 2007
Filed: January 26, 2007
___________
Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BYE and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Dr. Gabrielle F. Morris appeals the district court’s1 adverse judgment and
imposition of sanctions following a bench trial in this diversity action. Dr. Morris
brought suit against the McFarland Clinic and Dr. Terry McGeeney for (1) fraudulent
misrepresentation concerning Dr. Morris’ ability to obtain an Iowa medical license
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
and (2) breach of contract. In addition to entering judgment against Dr. Morris, the
court granted McFarland Clinic and Dr. McGeeney’s motion for sanctions in the
amount of reasonable attorney fees and expenses incurred in their attempt to obtain
production of certain documents provided to Dr. Morris’ attorney by the California
Medical Board.
Having carefully reviewed the record, including the magistrate judge’s thorough
and well-reasoned opinion, we find no basis for reversal. See Tadlock v. Powell, 291
F.3d 541, 546 (8th Cir. 2002) (factual findings reviewed for clear error and legal
conclusions reviewed de novo); Martin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 251 F.3d 691, 694
(8th Cir. 2001) (sanctions reviewed under abuse of discretion standard).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.