Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-4029•Craig Thorstenson v. Gale Norton
04-4029Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit28.02.2006
1The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-3678
___________
Sherille Harris, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
United States Postal Service; John E. *
Potter, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: February 7, 2006
Filed: February 13, 2006
___________
Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Sherille Harris, an African-American female, appeals the district court’s 1
adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment-discrimination action against
the United States Postal Service brought under Title VII. Having carefully reviewed
the record, see Kincaid v. City of Omaha, 378 F.3d 799, 803-04 (8th Cir. 2004)
(de novo standard of review), we agree with the district court that Harris’s allegations
were either time-barred or meritless, for the reasons explained in the district court’s
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
opinion. We also decline to consider Harris’s newly raised allegations on appeal. See
Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th
Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.