Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-3828•General Electric v. Union Planters Bank
03-3828Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.05.2005
1The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-2639
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Anthony L. Clemmons, * Western District of Missouri.
*
Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]
___________
Submitted: May 18, 2005
Filed: May 26, 2005
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Anthony Clemmons challenges the sentence imposed by the district court1 upon
his guilty plea to a felon-in-possession charge. His counsel has filed a brief and
moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). For
reversal, counsel argues that Clemmons’s criminal history was improperly calculated,
because three of his prior sentences should have been considered related. However,
these sentences were separated by intervening arrests, and thus were properly deemed
to be unrelated for purposes of Clemmons’s criminal history score. See U.S.S.G.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
§ 4A1.2. Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488
U.S. 75 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm, and
we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.