Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-2643•United States v. Ingmar Gillon
02-2643Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.10.2003
1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of Nebraska.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-3956
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
Laura A. Seger, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: September 30, 2003
Filed: October 6, 2003
___________
Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Laura Seger pleaded guilty to an indictment charging her with possessing with
intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (Count
I), and possessing a short-barreled shotgun in relation to the charged drug-trafficking
crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 924 and 2 (Count II). At sentencing, the district
court 1 denied Seger’s motion for a downward departure and sentenced her to
consecutive terms of 21 months’ imprisonment on Count I and 120 months’
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
imprisonment on Count II, to be followed by concurrent 3-year terms of supervised
release. Seger appeals, arguing that the district court erred in denying her departure
motion.
We conclude that Seger’s argument is unavailing. The district court lacked the
power to depart below the 10-year statutory minimum for Count II, see United States
v. Villar, 184 F.3d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1999), and we do not review the district court’s
discretionary decision not to depart from the Guidelines imprisonment range for
Count I, see United States v. Rice, 332 F.3d 538, 540 (8th Cir. 2003).
The judgment is affirmed.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.