Richard P. Landers v. Natl. RR Passenger

02-2841Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30.09.2003

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1 The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-1330
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
Jerry Wayne Green, Jr., *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: September 4, 2003
Filed: September 19, 2003
___________
Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Jerry Green, Jr. (Green) appeals the sentence imposed by the district court 1
after he pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, Green’s
counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Green
has filed a pro se brief. Having considered both briefs, and following our
independent review under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we affirm.

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
Specifically, we disagree with Green’s contention that the government
breached the plea agreement; and we conclude that, in setting the base offense level,
the district court properly considered as “crimes of violence” Green’s 1998 attempted
residential burglary conviction resulting from his attempt to help his girlfriend escape
from a juvenile detention facility, and his 2000 residential-burglary conviction. See
U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(2) (base offense level for firearm possession after two prior
felony convictions for crime of violence); U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2) (“crime of
violence” includes burglary of dwelling); United States v. Sun Bear, 307 F.3d 747,
750, 753 (8th Cir. 2002) (attempted burglary is crime of violence; attempted escape
from custody is crime of violence), cert. denied, 123 S. Ct. 2275 (2003). Green’s
ineffective assistance claims should be presented in post-conviction proceedings, if
at all. We find no other non-frivolous issues.
Accordingly, we grant counsels’ motion to withdraw and Green’s motion to
supplement his brief. We affirm the judgment.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.