Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-2089•United States v. Gregory D. White
00-2089Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30.11.2001
1 The Honorable Norman H. Stahl, United States Circuit Judge for the First
Circuit, sitting by designation.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-1736
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Western
* District of Missouri.
Sharon L. Wood, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
*
___________
Submitted: November 14, 2001
Filed: November 27, 2001
___________
Before BOWMAN, JOHN R. GIBSON and STAHL, 1 Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Sharon Wood pled guilty, without a plea agreement, to two counts of a
multicount indictment for conspiracy to distribute cocaine, and aiding and abetting
the distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 & 846. At her sentencing,
Wood objected to the calculation in the presentence investigation report regarding the
amount of drugs for which she should be held responsible and objected to the
-- 1 of 2 --
2 The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
-2-
presentation of any evidence regarding drug quantity, insisting that the government
was estopped from attributing to her any drugs deriving from transactions for which
it had not held a codefendant, Calvin Powell, responsible in its plea agreement with
him. The District Court 2 rejected her argument, and after an evidentiary hearing,
determined that she was responsible for 73.90 grams of cocaine. Wood was
sentenced to five months of incarceration and five months of home detention.
The District Court properly rejected Defendant's argument, which we agree
was meritless. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
ATTEST:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.