Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-1276•United States v. Thomas Lee Goldman
00-1276Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit29.09.2000
1The Honorable Russell G. Clark, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable James
C. England, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-3854
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Missouri.
Richard Perales, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: August 25, 2000
Filed: September 7, 2000
___________
Before BOWMAN, HEANEY, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
The district court1 committed Richard Perales to the Attorney General’s custody,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246, finding that he was suffering from a mental disease and
that his release would pose a substantial risk of bodily injury or serious property
damage. Perales appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
We conclude that the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous, see
United States v. S.A., 129 F.3d 995, 1000 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review), cert.
denied, 523 U.S. 1011 (1998), as they are supported by the unanimous opinion of the
government’s medical experts and Perales’s own medical expert, see United States v.
Lewis, 929 F.2d 440, 442 (8th Cir. 1991) (per curiam) (§ 4246 findings of mental
disease and dangerousness upheld where supported by unanimous expert opinion);
United States v. Steil, 916 F.2d 485, 488 (8th Cir. 1990) (emphasizing that “there is no
medical opinion to the contrary in the record before us” in affirming § 4246 findings
of mental illness and dangerousness).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.