Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-1293•John D. Johnson v. State of IA
00-1293Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.08.2000
1Complications from an automobile accident have prevented Judge Gibson from
reviewing this opinion prior to its being filed.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-4256
___________
Roderick Dodson, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Eastern
City of St. Louis, * District of Missouri.
*
Appellee. * [UNPUBLISHED]
___________
Submitted: June 14, 2000
Filed: August 14, 2000
___________
Before BOWMAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON,1 and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,
Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Roderick Dodson, a black firefighter, sued the City of St. Louis, claiming that
he had been discriminated against on the basis of race when he was suspended for eight
hours without pay for losing his radio. See 42 U.S.C. § 1981(a), § 2000e-2(a),
§ 2000e-5(f), and Mo. Rev. Stat. § 213.055.1(1)(a). He alleged that white firefighters
who lost their radios were typically disciplined less harshly for the same action.
-- 1 of 2 --
2The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
-2-
The city moved for summary judgment, proffering evidence that for the five
years previous to Mr. Dodson's suspension firefighters in St. Louis, regardless of race,
had suffered the penalty that Mr. Dodson complains of here. Mr. Dodson offered no
evidence to the contrary; in fact, he offered no evidence at all in opposition to the city's
motion, and did not move for additional time under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f). The district
court2 granted summary judgment to the city.
Since Mr. Dodson offered no evidence in support of his opposition to summary
judgment, it is plain that there was no error in awarding summary judgment to the city.
We therefore affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.