Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-1482•United States v. John Lars Person
00-1482Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.05.2000
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2751
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
*
v. *
*
Richard Mathis, *
*
Appellant. *
*
__________
Appeals from the United States
No. 99-2753 District Court for the
__________ District of South Dakota.
*
United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee, *
*
v. *
*
Doyle Mathis, *
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: April 7, 2000
Filed: May 8, 2000
___________
Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 2 --
1The HONORABLE JOHN B. JONES, United States District Judge for the
District of South Dakota.
-2-
___________
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals, Richard and Doyle Mathis each appeal the district
court’s1 order denying their joint motion for reconsideration of a motion filed in
Richard’s criminal tax fraud case. Because the May 25, 1999 notice of appeal was not
filed within ten days of the May 10, 1999 entry of the district court’s order, we lack
jurisdiction. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A) (in criminal case, defendant must file
notice of appeal within ten days of entry of order being appealed); Fed. R. App. P.
26(a) (computation of time).
The appeal is dismissed.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.