David E. Schroeder v. Norman E. Rouse

00-6002Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit28.04.2000

Gesamter Gesetzestext

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-3053
___________
Louis Watson, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social *
Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 13, 2000
Filed: April 19, 2000
___________
Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Louis Watson appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment affirming
the Commissioner's decision to deny Watson disability insurance benefits. Having
reviewed the administrative record, we conclude the administrative law judge carefully
considered the debilitating effect of Watson's alcohol abuse and substantial evidence
on the record as a whole supports the decision of the Commissioner that Watson is not
disabled for social security purposes. This case presents no novel issues to justify an

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
extended discussion. We thus affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's
memorandum and opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.