David E. Schroeder v. Norman E. Rouse

00-6002Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit28.04.2000

Gesamter Gesetzestext

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2035
___________
Kenneth E. Risinger, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Western
v. * District of Arkansas.
*
Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * [UNPUBLISHED]
Social Security Administration, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 3, 2000
Filed: April 4, 2000
___________
Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
In this action seeking review of the Social Security Commissioner's final decision
to deny Kenneth E. Risinger's applications for benefits, Risinger filed his notice of
appeal more than sixty days after the district court entered judgment in favor of the
Commissioner. We therefore lack jurisdiction over Risinger's appeal. See Fed. R.
App. P.4(a)(1)(B); 26; Burgs v. Johnson County, Iowa, 79 F.3d 701, 702 (8th Cir.
1996) (per curiam) (timely notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

-- 1 of 2 --

2–
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.