Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
98-1388•Anthony Kingsberry v. USA
98-1388Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.01.2000
1The HONORABLE WARREN K. URBOM, United States District Judge for
the District of Nebraska.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2724
___________
Gerald Egan, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
University of Nebraska at Lincoln, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: January 4, 2000
Filed: January 25, 2000
___________
Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Gerald Egan appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment dismissing
his claim that the University of Nebraska at Lincoln violated the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq., when it refused to hire him for a
live-in student residence hall position on account of his mental condition. The district
court sanctioned Egan for failing to make material discovery disclosures by precluding
him from offering evidence regarding his status as a qualified individual with a
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
disability. The court then granted summary judgment in favor of the University because
this discovery ruling left Egan unable to prove a prima facie case under the ADA.
After careful review of the record, we conclude that these rulings were not an abuse of
the district court’s discretion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.