Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-1195•Steven Williams, Jr. v. Nick J. Ludwick
13-1195Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit09.01.2014
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 14a0010n.06
Case No. 13-1195
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
STEVEN WILLIAMS, JR.,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
NICK J. LUDWICK,
Respondent-Appellee.
____________________________________/
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
MICHIGAN
Before: GUY, GIBBONS, ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM. Petitioner, Steven Williams, appeals the district court’s denial of his
petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 concerning his claim that the
state court unreasonably applied federal law to his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.
Because the district court issued a thorough written opinion which correctly stated the governing
law and facts of the case, and because issuance of a full opinion would be both duplicative and
serve no jurisprudential purpose, we AFFIRM the judgment on the basis of the district court’s
opinion entered on January 15, 2013. Williams v. Ludwick, No. 09-13558, 2013 WL 153321
(E.D. Mich. Jan. 15, 2013).
AFFIRMED.
-- 1 of 1 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.