Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
07-2141; 07-2555; 08-1403; 08-1545; 08-1763•In re: Casa Colonial Limited Partnership
07-2141; 07-2555; 08-1403; 08-1545; 08-1763Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit15.03.2010
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 10a0162n.06
Nos. 07-2141; 07-2555; 08-1403; 08-1545; 08-1763
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
In re: CASA COLONIAL LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP,
Debtor.
________________________________
VISURON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
CASA MIPROEAST LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, KEITH MITAN,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
(No. 07-2141)
v. ON APPEAL FROM THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COLLENE K. CORCORAN, Individually COURT FOR THE EASTERN
and as Trustee; DAVID R. SHOOK, DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Defendants-Appellees
_______________
VISURON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
an Indiana limited partnership, COLLENE K.
CORCORAN, Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Trustee,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
(No. 07-2555)
v.
MAXINE MILLER BARRETT, an individual;
ROBERT FROHM, Individually and as Trustee
of the Charles F. Barrett Fourth Amended and
Restated Trust; PINE GROVE CORPORATION,
a Michigan corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.
_______________
-- 1 of 4 --
2
In re: CASA COLONIAL LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP,
Debtor.
____________________________
VISURON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
(No. 08-1403)
v.
COLLENE K. CORCORAN, Chapter 7
Trustee of Bankruptcy Estate of Casa
Colonial Limited Partnership,
Defendant-Appellee,
_______________
In re: CASA COLONIAL LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP,
Debtor.
__________________________________
KEITH MITAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
(No. 08-1545)
v.
COLLENE K. CORCORAN, Chapter 7
Trustee of Bankruptcy Estate of Casa
Colonial Limited Partnership,
Defendant-Appellee,
_______________
-- 2 of 4 --
3
In re: CASA COLONIAL LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP,
Debtor.
_________________________________
VISURON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
(No. 08-1763)
v.
COLLENE K. CORCORAN, Chapter 7
Trustee of Bankruptcy Estate of Casa
Colonial Limited Partnership,
Defendant-Appellee.
_____________________________________/
BEFORE: SUHRHEINRICH, COLE, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. These consolidated appeals involve an ownership
dispute between the land contract vendors and vendee of a shopping center located in Port Huron,
Michigan. The 72nd Judicial District Court of Michigan granted the land contract vendors a
Judgment of Possession for the shopping center on July 18, 2001, and that decision was affirmed by
the St. Clair County Circuit Court and the Michigan Court of Appeals. The Michigan Supreme
Court declined to review the decision. After losing its state appeals, Casa Colonial Limited
Partnership (“Casa Colonial”), the vendee, filed for bankruptcy. Subsequently, Visuron Limited
Partnership (“Visuron”), represented by the same attorney as Casa Colonial, Keith Mitan (“Mitan”),
sued the bankruptcy estate, arguing that Visuron owned the shopping center. The bankruptcy court
and district court ruled in favor of Casa Colonial, now represented by Trustee Collene Corcoran.
-- 3 of 4 --
4
The bankruptcy court and the district court also sanctioned Mitan for misconduct before each
respective court.
After reviewing the briefs, the record, and its applicable law, we are persuaded that the
district court ruled correctly in all of its decisions. Furthermore, because Mitan has continued to use
the same frivolous arguments before this Court that he used before the bankruptcy court and the
district court, we award attorneys fees to the prevailing parties of this appeal, to be paid by Mitan.
Specifically, attorneys fees are awarded to the prevailing parties in Case Nos. 07-2141, 07-2555, 08-
1403, and 08-1763. We do not award attorneys fees for Case No. 08-1545. The prevailing parties
have 14 days to submit a bill of costs to this Court if they wish to collect attorneys fees. Mitan will
then have 14 days to file any objections.
Accordingly, we AFFIRM the decisions by the district court for the reasons stated in its well-
reasoned opinions dated June 19, 2006 (Case No. 07-2555), September 29, 2006 (Case No. 07-
2555), August 6, 2007 (Case No. 07-2141), November 20, 2007 (Case No. 07-2555), February 12,
2008 (Case Nos. 08-1403, 08-1545), March 19, 2008 (Case No. 08-1545), and April 22, 2008 (Case
No. 08-1763).
-- 4 of 4 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.