United States of America v. Clennie Manning

The government has indicated that a Supervised Release Violation Report was prepared and subsequently
5
updated, but never filed with the district court. At the government’s request, we amend our previous opinion, which
stated that no such report was ever prepared, “so as to reflect the work of the Probation Department, and so that the
record is correct.”
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION
File Name: 09a0241n.06
Filed: March 31, 2009
No. 07-4472
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
United States of America,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
Clennie Manning,
Defendant-Appellant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
BEFORE: MERRITT, ROGERS, and WHITE, Circuit Judges.
Pursuant to the government’s motion, we hereby amend our previous opinion by striking the
sentence on page 9 that stated: “No Presentence Report (or Supervised Release Violation Report)
was prepared, and thus we cannot presume that the district court considered the Guidelines despite
failing to mention them.” In its place, we insert the following sentence and footnote: “No
Presentence Report (or Supervised Release Violation Report) was filed with the district court, and5

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 07-4472
United States v. Manning
-2-
thus we cannot presume that the district court considered the Guidelines despite failing to mention
them.”
Accordingly, it is so ORDERED.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
______________________________________
Leonard Green, Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --