Kathy Miller v. Alltel Kentucky, Inc.

The Honorable C. Roger Vinson, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern*
District of Florida, sitting by designation.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 07a0810n.06
Filed: November 19, 2007
No. 06-6606
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
KATHY MILLER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALLTEL KENTUCKY, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
Before: DAUGHTREY and COOK, Circuit Judges; and VINSON, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM. In this appeal, we are called upon to consider whether the district court
properly entered (i) summary judgment against the plaintiff on her claim of sexually hostile work
environment, and (ii) a Rule 50(a) judgment as a matter of law against the plaintiff on her claim of
retaliation. Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having studied the record on appeal and
the briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in granting summary
judgment and judgment as a matter of law in favor of the defendant. Because the reasons why
judgment should be entered for the defendant have been fully articulated by the district court, the
issuance of a detailed opinion by this court would be duplicative and would serve no useful purpose.

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 06-6606
Miller v. Alltel Kentucky, Inc.
- 2 -
Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court upon the reasoning set out by that court
in its opinions and orders dated August 24, 2006, and November 28, 2006.

-- 2 of 2 --