Cranpark, Inc. v. Cedarapids, Inc.

The Honorable Gregory F. Van Tatenhove, United States District Judge for the Eastern*
District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 07a0603n.06
Filed: August 21, 2007
No. 06–4233
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
CRANPARK, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CEDARAPIDS, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF OHIO
Before: KEITH, GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges; and VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM. Plaintiff, Cranpark, Inc. (“Cranpark”), sued Defendant, Cedarapids, Inc.
(“Cedarapids”), in the Northern District of Ohio, alleging (1) breach of contract, (2) breach of
express warranties, (3) breach of the implied warranties of merchantability and of fitness for a
particular purpose, (4) breach of duty to repair, (5) misrepresentation, and (6) fraud. Concluding that
Cranpark’s claims are barred under the parties’ contractual agreement and the economic loss
doctrine, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Cedarapids. Cranpark now
appeals.
Because the reasons supporting summary judgment in favor of Cedarapids have been well
articulated by the district court’s thoughtful opinion, a detailed written opinion by this Court would
serve no valuable purpose. Therefore, we AFFIRM the district court’s grant of summary judgment

-- 1 of 2 --

on the basis of its written opinion.

-- 2 of 2 --